"All ideas which have far-reaching consequences are usually simple."
Despite the unbelievable scientific development during the 20th century, almost all traditional moral values were underestimated during this period as well. However, one should ask the following question: Where did the results of atheistic science lead to? It seems that into a blind alley. Various theories exist within physics as the most prestigious science, being independent on each other. Some of them are contradictory from the point of view of classical logic or even one theory eliminates the other. Despite of this, each of them is considered to be valid, at least under strongly defined conditions.
The most visible example is the contradicton between two great theories of 20th century - the theory of relativity, which is mostly applied in macro-world and, the quantum mechanics, the manifestation of which becomes obvious at the extremely small values of physical quantities (micro-world, if we are talking about dimensions, but in general, the quantum phenomena can be observed in macro-world too, e.g. at the extremely small temperatures). The problem arises everywhere we are forced to apply both these theories under special conditions like in the world of particle physics or theory of black holes. Although it seems that the superstring theory is on the right way to comply with those two theories, looking in details it appears that satisfactory solution requires the modification of at least one of them - the most probably, the hottest candidate is the theory of relativity.
The Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, being one of the basic quantum mechanics laws, strongly attacked our seeing of surrounding world - no more it is valid that starting at precisely defined conditions (the uncertainties of input parameters are equal to zero), the result is fully determinable.
Another example, the wave - corpuscular paradox, is leading to misunderstanding when we intend to explain the behavior of matter without anticipation of the shocking fact - the resulting trajectory is the linear superposition of all trajectories over the whole universe, having the same initial and same final points respectively. Approaching smaller and smaller dimensions, this fact results in the behavior where the term "trajectory" loses its sense and the wave aspects are more obvious.
Perhaps it was the mentioned above contradicton between the theory of relativity and quantum mechanics what should be found beyond the proclamation of then 38 year old mathematician and physicist S. W. Hawking (graduating as the professor in Cockroft lecture-hall of Cambridge University) who, having his introductory lecture, proclaimed the end of theoretical physics which is going to begin in the 21st century. The listeners were really shocked by this statement.
Thus I wanted to show the fact that different valid theories and systems exist, in spite of their contradiction in terms of classical logic. We should tolerate another systems and theories!
In all probability, boundaries of physics in terms it is known today are where begins the physics of consciousness. Let us mention namely Professor Jahn Robert, who is physicist and his affiliation is the research in the field of psychotronics (bio-communication).
The research of human counsciousness finds itself in a similary conflicting situation. As in theoretical physics we have here many different schools and philosophically based theories. While the one field discusses the doctrine of the free will of ego and the whole spectrum of schools of psychology based on the Freudian school and the classical philosophy, the other field deals with the conception of unconsiousness following the esotheric tradition of C.G.Jung, oriental philosophy (the hypnotic regress, holotropic breathing, transpersonal psychology) and biological mechanisms of personality.
There are also known arguments that genetics can provide us with all the answers to the philosophical questions.
I disagree with this opinion and would like to emphasize the fact that genetics and unconsciousness are essentialy not oposing each other rather they are compatible like hardware (organism) and software (unconsiousness) naturally interacting and complimenting each other.
Consciousness as a subset of unconsciousness can not be defined by neurological processes only, which is a statment approved by many reputable experts in this field.
According to certain theories counsiousness is a link between idea and matter, from a point of view of quantum physics it is actually a kind of matter, and it is exceeds to the higher levels of the time space continuum.
Few years ago I read a book "The Essence of Budhism" from already deceased theravadan Budhist monk Nyanasatta Thera (Martin Novosad) who lived his all life in a monastery in Sri Lanka. In this book he points out a fact that if we would approach the research of reincarnation with the same importance as given to the research in other fields of modern sience, the potential and credibility given to reincarnation would not be regarded so much as a "religion" but sientific fact.
Of course it is natural that in order for Western science to accept the proof of reincarnation we have to base our project on the experimental and statistic methods native to this science.